We often talk about HPI to designate a certain intelligence. In fact, it is not so much about IQ but about attitude.
Ultimately, doesn't intelligence divide into two major groups:
- Those who see every piece of information as potentially interesting
These people consider that every new element, after evaluating its relevance, will allow for a finer understanding of reality.
The idea takes precedence over its source or form.
- Those who are prisoners of internal and external ego discourses
These people do not react to the raw idea presented but to its personal implications. They focus on the form, attribute intentions, and filter information through the prism of their ego.
They feel "at stake" because of an idea, a development, a presentation.
Can we think that conceptually, among intellectuals and scientists, there is a majority of individuals from the first group?
Just imagine for a moment...
Otherwise, where would we be headed?
In our daily interactions, especially on social networks, which tendency dominates? Does LinkedIn, for example, influence this behavior?
And you, in which group do you most often recognize yourself?
I'll let you think about it if you're interested 😉